I can’t think of what non-public information would fit into the end of that section other than: intel suggesting some portion of the preceding information was false.
-
-
Well, I guess we’ll see. But the meetings are the key Steele claims in the application. I don’t know what Schiff’s claim that subsequent sources “corroborated Steele’s reporting” would mean other than “corroborated the meetings.”
-
They could also mean that Schiff is overselling the dossier, which is consistent with his other known actions AND with Warner's greater caution on the dossier, well after the Schiff memo.
-
Watching these forensics makes my day. Don't judge me.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Page says in his HPSCI testimony he met with Baranov while in Moscow, who was a senior executive at Rosneft. That was planned ahead of time, so if they read his emails, I would expect that to be in there somewhere.
-
Yup. As I note in about everything I write, Page might present interesting temporal restrictions, if they tried to shield stored comms from his time on the campaign. But he did travel overseas during the tail end of the period when 704b was a shitshow.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The Dossier doesn't have to be 100% correct? Isn't that how intelligence reports work?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.