The obvious thing would be: Information independent of Steele that contradicted factual statements Page had made in his denials. Showing Page had lied about some relevant conduct would, while not dispositive in isolation, tend to strongly bolster the broader case.
-
-
Any explanation would need to, at a minimum, note that they added a section after the first app, and note that the weird Feb 2017 letter blaming Hillary shows up in section VI. And note some of the things you've got here appear elsewhere.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Y'all should have a public forum on this stuff. The three of us in attendance would find it fascinating.
- End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.