Not sure how that's at all relevant to Chuck's tweet....btw I'm pretty sure the NYtimes covered the Clinton foundation right after Clinton Cash came out. It wasn't a Breitbart article.
-
-
-
1) Know what that NYT story was based off? Laundered Clinton Cash oppo research. It's like ... the Isikoff article. 2) You're right: FBI's willingness to use oppo research is not relevant to FBI's willingness to use oppo research. How silly of me.
-
I wonder how many FISA warrants they got into the Clinton foundation...
-
Ever heard of 702?
-
Yes. Page wasn't applicable.
-
Hmm. I don't think you understood.
-
I'm thinking your point is FISA would be off limits with Clinton foundation.
-
You're thinking wrong. Btw, you do know the fact that long-term suspected RU asset Carter Page's "applicability" for a FISA order actually suggests there was MORE reason to investigate him?
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
While it was the product of opposition research, Steele had professional interactions with the FBI in the past and maybe we can acknowledge the dossier is both oppo research and intel from an informant. I can see the latter leading a judge to believe it warrants a deeper look.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Marcy is really putting the heat on chuck. When this all goes down can’t wait to see her victory lap
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
hey emptywheel you spelled "head" wrong...
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Pot. Kettle. Black. The projection coming from the GOP is staggering.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Chuck is in the death throes of a failed conspiracy theory. The hangers-on are always the worst. Too bad he doesn't have any credibility to lose.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"Political Opp" Just some reacted political opposition research that is obviously false and slanders a good manpic.twitter.com/c6n4ulJiun
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No, no, no, see that's different 'cuz...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
LOL. Hey
@ChuckRossDC, it's unfortunate you aren't brighter than a dull hammer-- if you were, you'd probably appreciate how badly@emptywheel dunks on you in literally every one of your exchanges. But as a dim bulb Trump hack, you'll never know.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So, if one has committed treason, totally evidenced, one may hope to avoid charges/sentencing based on technicalities? Is that all Trump has? Yes.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.