1) I've avoided DNC-CS-FBI server issue mainly cause a) I'm not tech savvy b) am more concerned w/ collusion (email hacks are not 9/11; if RU colluded w/ Trump, that's huge) but this 2017 @emptywheel post (surprisingly? given her stance now) raises Qs: https://www.emptywheel.net/2017/01/06/on-the-dnc-server-fight/ …
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @aaronjmate
It's a point about not feeding the conspiracy theorists, one validated by the conspiracy theorists. BUt I also 1) know that this server is not the end all and be all the conspiracy theorists make it out to be 2) know of (and knew at the time) a whole shit-ton of validating info
9 replies 1 retweet 12 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @aaronjmate
We're not the conspiracy theorists, we're the ones refusing to believe the DNC's conspiracy theory without more evidence.
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likes -
True1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @radezz @briantcairns and
radezz and Brian, since you're not "conspiracy theorists," how long will it take you to link to one emptywheel post about the DNC server--but not aaron's--and identify the first sentence in it which you find false, inaccurate, or incomplete?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @runtodaylight @radezz and
She mostly speculates based on limited facts, so it's not that her facts are wrong, I'm simply unconvinced by her speculation. If you're convinced, then good for you, we'll just disagree.
4 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Yes, right. FBI spent hours in a room with someone who was just speculating wildly. RIght.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.