Supporting JA is also about the broader issues, I do not support a cult of personality but I do support the right of a publisher/ journalist to publish. I do not support torture or indefinite detention so I support his release. Truth will come & I trust we will hear it from JA.
-
-
-
I support the right of a publisher, and have, repeatedly. What's at issue here is evidence he went beyond that. Plus, that I know of evidence that disproves a very elaborate campaign of disinformation that JA's backers have embraced.
-
Hasnt JA been proven to have been involved in selectively aiding the GOP and likely for personal gain? Also, working with Russians on obtaining info? How is that acceptable? Normally when people publish info that is important for the public its not for personal financial gain
-
That's still not distinguishable from what the Daily Caller does. But JA has gone beyond journalism.
-
Btw you are the first radio or podcast ive listened too. I have a thing with hearing but i heard you on a ten minute npr talk covering your decision to go to the fbi about a source. You sounded great! Thank you for what you do!
-
I stand up for accountability, whistleblowing, publishing, & journalism. My fear is that if anyone goes down for publishing or journalism in a democracy, a significant part of our democratic process could suffer. I realize it is already suffering, but it is the line I will draw.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Or how about honest people just wanting specific evidence to back up your allegation that Russia specifically gave Wikileaks emails... You still haven't provided anything tangible to this day whatsoever.
-
That's not what I have alleged.
-
"Russia gave Wikileaks stolen emails to publish" -Marcy Wheeler. Where is your evidence for this claim?
-
- That is an accusation, not evidence. And it will never see a day in court, because Mueller made sure only to indict people outside US reach. - Assange announced pending leak on June 12. The indictment doesn't even allege any communication with G2 before that date - only after.
-
The claim that the mails WL has published (DNC + Podesta) were passed from G2 to WL more than 10 days AFTER Assange publicly announced pending leak is just nonsense. They don't even accuse them of communication before June 12th.http://www.itv.com/news/update/2016-06-12/assange-on-peston-on-sunday-more-clinton-leaks-to-come/ …
-
It's been over 24 hours and Marcy still hasn't substantiated her claim against Wikileaks. If she doesn't have direct evidence for her claim, the journalistically ethical thing to do is retract her allegation. Do you stand by the above claim against Wikileaks still, Marcy?
-
Here are then President Obama, DNI Clapper, and FBI Director Comey for you, Marcy.https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=XEu6kHRHYhU …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
lotta that going around “i demand you reveal all of the evidence of my wrongdoing you have to me immediately on my chosen timeframe because thats what happens when crime doers get caught” the kids call this shit “evidence of consciousness of guilt”
-
Amusing that Trump, Giuliani and WL walkers are using the same strategy.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Safety first please
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Anyone pretending WL & Russia didn't do all of this at this point are just cultists for whom no amount of evidence will suffice
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
