Why so nasty? If you can add something, why don’t you enrich the writer’s content rather than peeing on it.
-
-
-
Because it's a shit piece. If he wants to enrich his piece such that it's factual then maybe I'll work a little harder.
-
Thanks. For us lay people, separating shit from chocolate ice cream is difficult without the tools and knowledge others have.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Am I wrong, or do I remember a report about a Scandinavian intelligence group that resided in GRU's network for over a year collecting EVERYTHING? I couldn't find the reference. Can't remember the country. Dang. My brain is mush these days.
-
Dutch. Yes. That's where a bunch of the info on the hacking side of this comes from.
-
Thanks for the confirmation. Thought I dreamed it or something. They picked up every keystroke, every login, and even have video of these agents sitting at their stations, correct?
-
Here's the English language version of that January 2018 article from the Dutch news outlethttps://www.volkskrant.nl/wetenschap/dutch-agencies-provide-crucial-intel-about-russia-s-interference-in-us-elections~b4f8111b/ …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Everything in that sentence after "half a clue" is redundant.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Sounds like a protection racket
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Mikhailov?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Homework? SIGH.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.