Folks: It is possible to believe (as I do) that people very close to Trump will be accused of some very ugly crimes. AND Believe that it violates the spirit of our Constitution to use the word "traitor" to describe Rand Paul's stupid comments.
-
-
I was referencing him & this is a compelling counter-argument. You ascribe to this conclusion that active intelligence measures should not be confused with a new type of warfare? My main Q still stands. He’s not a traitor in a conservative interpretation b/c no declared war.
-
But he is taking a position that benefits Russia and Congressional Republicans who are attacking the rule of law. You agree with that but worry about the loose application of the word “traitor?” Am I right?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.