Nope. Computer data doesn't have a new meaning "in a few weeks". You are bullshitting. C0 C2 C9 45 F6 C6 D1 01 won't have a "new meaning" in a few weeks. Don't ask us to "trust" you on it. You've demonstrated - clearly - that you are untrustworthy.
-
-
Replying to @HisBlakeness
"Meaning." You invented that. I said "show." Your problem, little boy playing with toys, is that you are making false interpretations of what you're looking at. I don't care if you find me untrustworthy. I will continue to laugh at you as a confused little child.
1 reply 1 retweet 8 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
False interpretations? Some timestamps? The stupidity of a hacker incriminating himself? The technical detail is there for all to see. Or those that *want* to see it. It's not an opinion, a bias, or a ruse. Investigative journalists - like you used to be - should follow it.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HisBlakeness
I'm familiar with the evidence. I just happen to understand what it means. Which is why I find you so childlike and sweet and naive and pathetic.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
You know what it means? Why so cryptic? Let me be frank: you are being played. You don't know it. Sycophants won't tell you. But I will, because you used to be the one people looked to. Who told you "what it means"? What do they have to benefit from having you "know"? Act.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HisBlakeness
Who told me what it means? One of the people centrally involved.
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @HisBlakeness
Were you centrally involved? Are you confessing to being part of the hacking operation? If not, I'll go with the guy who was.
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
For the Love of Christ. Woman - wake up. You are being played. If you ignore technical data, at the expense of what people have emailed/told you, then you're in serious trouble. You've decided on feelings over facts. I'm NOT attacking you. I'm asking you to come to your senses
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HisBlakeness
The person involved in the operation anticipated all you little boys playing dress-up months before you guys started getting involved. Took me a long time to understand what he was saying. But YOU, my friend, are the one being played.
2 replies 1 retweet 6 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
Then you didn't read my thread did you? You really didn't. That *was* my point. The G2 documents were there to play us. Or play CNN viewers. You - the mouthpiece - are they one they need to play. I'm with the crowd, but peeking between my fingers.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
This is getting really tedious. I understand the technical evidence. I do! But unlike you children playing dressup I know what they mean. You guys, however, are still playing cops and robbers. Pew pew pew!
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel @HisBlakeness
Again, the guy centrally involved in the op basically predicted a bunch of boys would be playing cops and robbers in real time. And voila! There you are!
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @HisBlakeness
This is a really, really interesting piece of info.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.