Note: Some of the info in this indictment you're giving NSA credit for I know (from a witness) Hillary's people contributed to as well. She didn't have slackers for infosec like the DNC did.
-
-
You said "She didn't have slackers for infosec" I pointed out that the FBI pointed out that she didn't have *anybody* for infosec.
-
Again, got a quote that's pertinent to the topic at hand. Do you even RECOGNIZE it's not?
-
Do you not recognize that it is? She had no security people, tbe Russia Hax was made up to excuse the difficult questions of what was discovered from the Wikileaks release of information and has not changed since Hillary first started shopping it around.https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2016/10/19/third-presidential-debate-trump-clinton-wikileaks-open-borders-sot.cnn/video/playlists/third-presidential-debate-2016/ …
-
She did not deny that the information was correct, she just tried to say "you're quoting Wikileaks, Russia Russia Russia" while acknowledging that the information was true. Two years of investigations later and we have no new real information.
-
Hi. You're conflating a non public server in 2013 with public ones in 2016, which is hysterically moronic. Note how the indictment doesn't describe Hillary campaign emails being victimized, even tho it does describe attempts? Why do you think that is?pic.twitter.com/fq632FaV0b
-
Again. The DNC contracted crowdstrike, Hillary doesn't have infosec people.
-
The point being made is Hillary had a real infosec operation for her campaign in ‘16, vs the personal server she had in ‘13 that the FBI report is referencing
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Shorthand for those who are confused: Hillary's personal server <> DNC Systems <> Hillary Campaign Systems <> Various hosted personal email accounts.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.