Mueller's indictment just put two more nails in the coffin of the Steele dossier's credibility:
1. Aleksej Gubarev - supposedly helped hack DNC
Not indicted
2. Michael Cohen - supposedly went to Europe to "pay off" hackers
Russian intelligence officers need paying off?
-
-
Didn't Page place a bug in some publicly sourced materials he gave some Russians, as well as testify in court? Didn't his work in bringing down that spy ring end just a few months before they decided he was now a threat? You must know more than I do about his story."sought out.."
-
Nah. None of that is true. The FBI considered him an ongoing suspected asset in March 2016, and then saw him join the Trump campaign and talk about making deals w/RU. So what do you do?
-
You send an Agent to Trump Tower at 10:00 am and ask to speak with Carter Page... If he allows, you interview him and express concern. (All done above the table...)
-
Because that is how CI works? All done above the table?
-
No. Apparently you just assume it needs to be a CI Investigation... and piss all over him and a campaign for POTUS! What could go wrong??
-
When you see an intel op try to infiltrate a campaign, yes, you open a CI investigation. It would be a dereliction of duty not to. I don't remember the FBI pissing on the Trump campaign in 2016.
-
That depends on the objective — you act as though spying on US citizens (& military veterans) is the only option... Guess what: It isn’t! If the objective was to minimize Russian influence (in the election, or in general) then decision was, at a min., a colossal failure.
-
If you need any evidence of that... then consider the fact that you are having this discussion. I don’t care what you think of Carter Page, Donald Trump, Jim Comey, Strzok... or any other name tied to this discussion — the effort was ineffective!
- 14 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.