Yes, they do. Libyan and Somali terror suspects have been tendered to the US to stand trial, no?
-
-
Sigh. It’s ‘relevant’ because Mueller has filed such add-on charges. Otherwise, I agree, not very noteworthy. And with that, I am returning to my regularly scheduled programming — a baseball game
-
No. He has not filed "add-on charges." He has used such charges to get people to flip to get to the "collusion."
-
I thought you said they were irrelevant. Anyway, what I meant was you said more precisely.
-
Fair. I just think given that we've got clear evidence Mueller is aggressively investigating Trump FOR collusion, the focus on obstruction is odd. There's no one Trump could flip on.
-
I’m back. (
#Nationals imploded again, this time v. lowly#Mets .) Fyi, 1st article of impeachment voted against Nixon by House Judiciary was obstruction of justice. Just saying. Maybe Mueller has that in his longview calculus? http://watergate.info/impeachment/articles-of-impeachment … - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Indicting RU GOV. officials allows the term "act of war." If that's established, it may direct types of crimes in future indictments?
-
Plenty of charging ability without testing the boundaries in that way. Mueller's going straight down the middle. The core is conspiracy against the United States. Money laundering will add spice. Obstruction brings up the rear.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.