This, from Lawfare, is one of the few treatments of yesterday's indictment that hits both the technical and legal aspects of it.https://www.lawfareblog.com/russia-indictment-20-what-make-muellers-hacking-indictment …
-
Show this thread
-
Though I will say this abt Lawfare piece: This is badly incorrect, and should be corrected.pic.twitter.com/ZEvZTXBtVC
8 replies 50 retweets 120 likesShow this thread -
The REASON it's incorrect is 1) we know even from public releases there were separate RU CI investigations 2) Republicans are conflating all "investigations into RU operation" to discredit the collusion one.
10 replies 151 retweets 406 likesShow this thread -
I keep pointing out that the information I shared was not touched by Peter Strzok. That's bc it came in via another one of those investigations. https://www.emptywheel.net/2018/07/11/peter-strzok-is-a-sideshow-to-information-that-directly-implicates-the-president/ …
11 replies 118 retweets 353 likesShow this thread -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.