This, from Lawfare, is one of the few treatments of yesterday's indictment that hits both the technical and legal aspects of it.https://www.lawfareblog.com/russia-indictment-20-what-make-muellers-hacking-indictment …
-
-
Why is it important that people understand Strzok is not the key to tainting the entire investigation?
-
I think it's because that is the pretext the GOP is using to impeach Rosenstein.
-
They are using non-compliance to doc requests I think. There is a reason she wants this known. She already knows the house gop doesn’t want to hear it because they didn’t take her up on her offer to brief them. If it’s important, we will find out sooner or later I suppose.
-
One of them did take her up on it
-
Didn’t know that. Thought she said they turned her down.
-
She said one did meet with her and that she had informally contacted Goodlatte but no response. She said her next step was that she was going to formally offer to meet w/Goodlatte (I assume by writing a letter? But idk)
-
Ok Wow, she really wants them to have her info.
-
Yes it seems so! Goodlatte doesn't seem to be trustworthy... I mean for goodness sakes the house gop is supposedly planning to try to impeach Rosenstein Monday!
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Right. But aside from him having an affair and talking like Ted Cruz, how much has he really tainted anything?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So wow...you're saying that your information is "at the core" of what will hold the Americans involved responsible?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Essentially, you're implying the FBI compartmentalized its investigation to (gasp) avoid the perception of tainting/bias?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.