This, from Lawfare, is one of the few treatments of yesterday's indictment that hits both the technical and legal aspects of it.https://www.lawfareblog.com/russia-indictment-20-what-make-muellers-hacking-indictment …
-
-
Any particular thoughts about if this is significant or just organizational stuff?
-
I argue it's critical to understanding the Mueller inquiry. Stuff was separate, then got mixed in, and is now separate again.
-
Quick followup: is there any logic to which offices opened each investigation? I.e. why was the work happening in Pittsburg rather than somewhere else? Does it have to do with the location of events or some bureaucratic logic?
-
Pittsburgh has close ties to US-CERT. It's where nation-state hacker cases start. SF has lots of tech victims/venue bc of use of their infrastructure. Philly, as I understand it, had to do with a server there.
-
Would the server in Philly be the marketing server sending Trump Org emails?
-
No, that is a red herring. More likely something to do with the DNC since their convention was in Philly
-
I think it was actually nothing. Don't overthink Philly.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
not NY either.
must be pissed. -
Purely coincidental?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Well, Philadelphia would be a good spot for RU monitoring. It’s close to DC, NJ, NYC and has a sizable Russian diaspora in the north east of the city.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What's the significance of pretty clearly laying out Wikileaks' role in this indictment without doing so by name?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.