My DMs are full of people saying "rat-fucker!!!" "blowjob!!!!" This is why they don't let me talk about Roger Stone (or Lee Stranahan) on live TV, I guess.
-
-
What they could have done is used her analytics to figure out how they could target ads to fuck with turnout in a way where her model wouldn’t detect what was happening—an adversarial example attack in machine learning parlance.
-
To expand a bit: you could run scenarios against her data to find situations where it would return the same results for different input. Brute-force detect edge cases where her model would fail. Like where to run ads in Wisconsin so that her model wouldn’t see support softening.
-
I’m not a Sec-anything person but do you mean ads like these?pic.twitter.com/e0YTVEh8xR
-
Also, Marcy, your comment about Hillary’s analytics and plans on Chris Hayes’ show tonight made me think of this paragraph from a Bloomberg article from Nov. 2016. In other interviews Trump actually credits Manafort with helping him win MI and WI.pic.twitter.com/3BRBarM8xv
-
Could the theft in Sept. be connected to Manafort’s late-in-the-game advice to target those swing states?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Not tampered with but data they would have given to the trump campaign?
-
My guess is that's why it's in there, they introduce it but don't say what happened to it.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
hey all! make SURE you follow the brilliant, Marcy Wheeler on all of this. & read
@emptywheel every damn day. you were GREAT on@chrislhayes just now. Chris will agree!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
it seems her campaign viewed reports from field canvassers in rust belt states as outliers too, so it still seems that she blew most of her lead on her own. Also, and lest we forget, Bernie would have won.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What I infer from your timeline is that the DNC, Clinton herself, Podesta, and probably Bernie's organization were totally compromised, probably before any of the time points we've seen so far.
-
Then there's the Anthony Weiner episode. Lord only know what was planted on his laptop and by whom.
-
If someone planted something, the man is in jail serving time!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
They could have passed data to Parscale.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I thought you were awesome!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
why not? tampering could be subtle---few percent here and there, few thousand voters here and there, etc..
-
@mikefarb1 goes into EXTENSIVE detail on exactly this... -
I don't think he's a reliable source for a number of reasons but agree that anyone flagging potential vote tampering (or voter roll tampering, etc) early on definitely deserved to be listened to..
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
That doesn't really check out. Analytics is just stats counting at the end of the day and you can make it as subtle or dramatic as you like if you have the keys to the car.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Couldn't they just tamper enough so it didn't seem like an outlier...?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'd like to see this refuted with evidence at some point. Mook was ignoring his field operatives who were begging for a different ground game in WI, MI, PA etc. Would they even realize what an outlier looked like?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.