Does Andy Biggs know that Trump tweets even more--and in more incriminating fashion--than Peter Strzok does?
-
-
Show this thread
-
Is Grothman actually treating Trump's promise to
#DrainTheSwamp as good faith here?Show this thread -
OMIGOSH Grothman apparently BOTH believes that FBI agents aren't conservative and ALSO believes Trump is draining the swamp.
Show this thread -
FINALLY! 9 hours into this shit show Strzok explains the insurance text. Almost as important as his response to Gowdy.
Show this thread -
Incidentally one of these frothy Republicans clarified there were no informants used against Trump before the investigation opened.
Show this thread -
Strzok: There are an inordinate number of meetings. We're the government. We have meetings.
Show this thread -
GOP: Govt should run like a business. Except ... top executives must read everything personally.
Show this thread -
-
9 hours in Handel worries about someone being blackmailed. But she's worried about Strzok not Trump.
Show this thread -
Rothfus just got Strzok to confirm 702 data accessed in Hillary case. I think.
Show this thread -
Comer just cut off Strzok while he was in the middle of eplaining how his effort to be more aggressive got quashed.
Show this thread -
Strzok notes (I think) Trump wasn't target of investigation when he was texting mean things.
Show this thread -
Goodlatte: This hearing isn't stupid. It's a much bigger matter. A larger global and existential issue of equality under the law. Denigrates core of our system of justice. Most Americans don't consider fair and unbiased investigations as stupid.
Show this thread -
Goodlatte: We now consider the DAG on the line for failing to let you to answer questions. This is Goodlatte trying to use as excuse to fire Rosenstein.
Show this thread -
Again: I informally offered to explain why this is a sideshow. So far Goodlatte doesn't want to hear.
Show this thread -
Once again: Peter Strzok Is a Sideshow to Information that Directly Implicates the President https://www.emptywheel.net/2018/07/11/peter-strzok-is-a-sideshow-to-information-that-directly-implicates-the-president/ …
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It’s not just about his body language. I believe first answered that he didn’t recall what he had discussed. And he also knew that he had been wiretapped, so knowingly lying about the contents of those wiretaps would have been self-sabotage.
-
Aaron Perhaps you can ground these claims in the public record--bc some hoax claims have leaked into your beliefs.
-
Flynn was interviewed 1/24/2017. 2 days before: https://www.wsj.com/amp/articles/u-s-eyes-michael-flynns-links-to-russia-1485134942 …
-
By public record I meant official documents.
-
Ok. Doesn't change my initial point: he knew he was wiretapped by the time he had the FBI interview, and no official document can contradict that since his wiretapping was reported by the WSJ and WP before the FBI interview.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.