What you've just claimed is different than what I said.
-
-
Are the 'alleged' hysterical mistakes too secret to divulge to us, AGAIN?

-
No. I've written about them. Maybe refer to the public record on that point.
-
Because I've already found your PUBLIC RECORD writings wanting, and given your responses when asked basic quesions... I now find them to be basically lies. And when confronted, you deflect.https://twitter.com/MonsieurAmerica/status/1016791349192896513 …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
SOME VIP’s agreed on a inconclusive theory. I asked VIP’s to remove my name from an early memo that posted with more than I signed on for; I gave up. I supported that a portion of their tech hypothesis was possible but not the only possibility & the political rhetoric subjective.
-
And that I agree with entirely. I'm glad the underlying analysis was done. The conclusions drawn from it were way beyond what the evidence supported.
-
Why be glad underlying analysis as done if "They get basic facts so hysterically wrong as to make the value of the analysis moot."
Square THAT for us who speak English as our first language, please. -
Taking a small bit of tech evidence and extrapalating it to conclusove is radically wrong.
-
Right: I'd go further. Most of that analysis mistakes the universe of total servers, for example, or total known hacks, or total known source locations. It also doesn't account for another part of the investigation I've reported on.
-
Holy COW you're not self absorbed are you?
-
Actually no, I do not see us as being self absorbed. Jumping to that conclusion without any actual facts to support it is radically wrong. I would also say that you have contributed an excellent example of what we we have been trying to convey. Thank you.
-
Saying the narrowly constructed VIPS techn report, commenting on July 5th breach is a failure because it doesn't address "another part of the investigation **I've** reported on" is self absorbed. Not you Lisa. And not the fact that conclusions don't derive from the base.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.