When the Steele dossier conspiracy theories get so embarrassing not even Chuck Ross will mainline them.http://thehill.com/hilltv/rising/396307-Did-FBI-get-bamboozled-by-multiple-versions-of-Trump-dossier%3F …
-
-
Could you pls provide any shred of solid evidence that
#Russia gave emails to#WikiLeaks? When I say “solid evidence” I mean facts that can be independently verified, not unsubstantiated claims by intelligence -
I don't have firsthand knowledge of how the emails got to WL. I do have nonpublic knowledge that undermines the public debunkings however.
-
If you don’t have any firsthand info on the
#WikiLeaks’ source/sources for#DNC and#Podesta emails why do you disseminate the narrative of the US intelligence agencies who have an obvious interest to undermine#WikiLeaks’ reputation and have done so since 2010? -
What you've just claimed is different than what I said.
-
You wrote that
#Russia gave emails to#WikiLeaks,and I asked whether you have any solid evidence on this -
I'm aware of what you asked. I'm also aware that you mischaracterized my response. My response will remain what it was, and you may misread it however you like.
-
I don’t want to misread I just want to understand why you write that Russia gave emails to
#WikiLeaks if you don’t have any solid evidence which can be independently verified -
And there you mischaracterize what I said again. I'm going to leave it at that. You may continue to mischaracterize my response to you all you want. But I will simply continue to note you're doing that.
- 9 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Wikileaks has stated that the emails were not given to them by Russia or any foreign government
-
Yes. And the universe of people who pretend to be unaware of such things as cut-outs, even in a story where we've seen a slew of them already, is vast.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Actually it was cambridge Analytica but there we are ... same fucking difference
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Strzok quietly opened an investigation into trump-Russia collusion on July 31, 2016 after he HURRIEDLY SHUT DOWN the FAUX investigation into Hillary Clintons massive corruption. Fixed that part for them
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Why does it matter where they came from, more than the crimes they expose? Doesn't rigging the primaries matter at all to you? Journalists protect their sources all over the world, except this one. So badly rigged they had to stop exit polling, in embarrassment.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
How many ways does
@wikileaks have to say that Russia wasn’t the source of the leaked emails before it sinks in? Outside of hearsay from anonymous sources there isn’t a shred of evidence to support the RussiaGate conspiracy.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.