Someone should tell Solomon about the part of the election year operation where Russia gave Wikileaks stolen emails to publish.pic.twitter.com/81JRVspvnK
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Someone should tell Solomon about the part of the election year operation where Russia gave Wikileaks stolen emails to publish.pic.twitter.com/81JRVspvnK
Soloman is going from primary sources: text messages from key FBI employees. What makes that a "conspiracy theory"?
Aside from the fact that every single time Solomon uses primary sources there are demonstrable ones he doesn't include? Bc it's unsurprising that a serial document was turned over in different form. The premise is just painfully stupid.
I thought that while watching France Vs Belgium that Kevin de Bruyne had some very fancy footwork, but yours when dodging round just answering a simple question is superior. So it's not a conspiracy theory. He's quoting the texts. Why don't you point to the ones he left out?
Hi. Before I do that can you explain why it is SCANDALOUS that a dossier that was written as a series of reports was turned over to FBI in different formats at different times? Bc w/o an explanation for that the exercise is plain stupid.
Sure. One source is reported to be Blumenthal & Shearer - Clinton hatchetmen to Isikoff. The other Steele. That they matched "independently" is startling.
YOU HAVE NEVER HEARD OF COPY PASTE???? No. No, it's not startling. That has been very easy to do for 3 decades.
It is startling, that you don't think it's startling. Something tells me you've been neglecting the other-side of the story. If you're going to be partisan - that's absolutely fine. Just advertise as such.
yeah, that's it. Solomon is right. :)
After days of wrestling his muse, Solomon decided to go with "like dandelions in an untreated lawn..."
You stated as fact that "Russia gave Wikileaks stolen emails to publish". When asked for evidence you claimed your statement was mischaracterized. How? You haven't said, and then you ducked out of the conversation. This sort of thing should be beneath you.
Cohen could be sitting on a Trump abortion payout, which may or may not have legal ramifications, in the middle of a SC nomination that seems to be hinged around abortion. He could also have personal views on the subject and could place himself at the center.
man it's obvious you just stick to the facts when an outlet has to put 'opinion contributor' directly in your byline
You should talk.
Oh honey! The only thing not proven YET is the piss tape. It's coming
Wondering why the dossier is still a thing, frankly.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.