Sorry. This is just transcription. At least say, "Trump's lawyers are claiming to believe." It's not true and if you believe it you're not doing your job.pic.twitter.com/LLgbCjZmnL
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
I think the phrase 'Trump concluded..' essentially implies that that's what Trump believes (or maybe his lawyers by association). But I do agree that this is par for the course from these two.
Trump is, as the piece notes elsewhere, a liar.
No disagreement there. I am always leery of reading Haberman (and to some extent Schmidt) pieces because half of it is telegraphing disguised as recaps.
!!!! THIS HAS BEEN WHAT I HAVE BEEN SAYING FOREVER! Or, “Trump really believes there’s no evidence of collusion.” WHAT? How do you know what he believes? Write, “Trump claims to believe,” or “insists,” but don’t improperly vouch for his statements of belief.
I think NYT journalists and editors think that if they're just a little bit more "fair" and a teensy bit more "even-handed" that the far right will stop heaping derision on them. Mmmm... I don't think that's gonna happen.
Whoa whoa whoa, you want Maggie to actually put some fucking effort into it?
Times has been writing this way forever. Used to make me livid in the old newsprint days. Now at least we can talk back on Twitter.
It took 12 paragraphs but we did finally get to the one that opened with “Critics say”
Aren't investigators always determined to find wrongdoing? That's why they are investigating!
Investigators are determined to find the truth.
They begin because of a suspicion of wrongdoing.
The normalization of his Shitshow continues
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.