Good opinion on conspiracy and accomplice liability from @JusticeWillett. But I vote against using footnotes as a place to put legal authority -- 35 of them, over 14 pages. Too hard to read up and down to see authority needed to follow opinion, I think. http://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/17/17-40552-CR0.pdf …
-
-
Replying to @OrinKerr @JusticeWillett
I'm conflicted about this. This approach makes opinions much more accessible to a lay audience, and to the extent the authority is important to the point being made in the text, the author can mention it in the text (e.g., "As the Supreme Court said just last year").
3 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @AlexanderAbdo @JusticeWillett
I agree that's the best case for the practice. But it also tends to hide the basis for different points for the nerds.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
Try reading two copies of same PDF side by side?
1:48 PM - 18 Jun 2018
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.