5 days after the release of the HPSCI Russia report, Michael Caputo realized he and Roger Stone had perjured themselves, and HPSCI drew conclusions about "collusion" based on that perjury. And he said nothing for 2 months.
-
-
There's plenty of evidence that Greenberg was an FBI informant, as the WaPo article explained. We know that Strzok mentioned using oconus lures. We know Stephen Halper was asking Page and Papadopoulos about stolen emails. Doesn't this warrant a bit more curiosity?
-
Halper asked Page abt emails? Do you know what oconus lures are?
-
Sorry, just Papadopoulos, but presumably Halper was also spying/informing on Page. My understanding is that ocunus lures refer to spies/informants used outside of the US. Maybe you can clarify if that's not the case. It's interesting that the FBI initially retracted that text.
-
Why would you call someone working for the USG, a lifetime Republican using the least intrusive means to chase down real leads on Russians trying to infiltrate a campaign, a spy?
-
Also, do you have any evidence at all that oconus lures refers to the Trump investigation, which didn't start until 8 months later?
-
I don't at all. I think we deserve to know if it was or not. I just find it interesting, given what we know now about Mifsud, Halper, and now Greenberg.
-
And ZERO of them involved oconus lures. And all of them happened at least 4 months after the oconus lure text.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.