So Marcy's theory here is that these FBI assets were, uh, in fact doing Putin's bidding? 
Hmm. Then you haven't even followed Trump's twitter account. Which makes you ... not a serious interlocutor on this point.
-
-
To the contrary, I have. But I am human and can forget things every now and then. Every Trump tweet that I can recall offhand alluding to "spygate" always references a very general phrase, such as "embedded informant." But I guess that makes me not a "serious interlocutor." Lol
-
So I went through all of Trump's tweets where he references a spy. There was not one single instance of him referencing a specific person's name. ...So do you know whom Marcy is talking about, Thomas? Here, see for yourself. https://mobile.twitter.com/search?q=from%3ArealDonaldTrump%20spy&src=typed_query …
-
Pretending for the moment you're operating in good faith, just for shits and giggles, where did you say "name" here?https://twitter.com/88softaIlherita/status/1008362946823516160 …
-
You asked me why Trump hasn't "wailed" against FBI's asset Felix Sater. I told you (quite correctly) that Trump hasn't "single[d] out any of the FBI's or CIA's assets that were used against his political campaign." Now we can debate the propriety of a sitting President to...
-
But then for you to use that as some sort of proof in your super Putin spies theory is, uh, intellectually questionable at best.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.