So Marcy's theory here is that these FBI assets were, uh, in fact doing Putin's bidding? 
Why is it that Trump hasn't wailed about FBI asset Felix Sater infiltrating his life?
-
-
Tbh, I haven't heard Trump single out any of the FBI's or CIA's assets that were used against his political campaign. So under your Russian conspiracy theory, does that make them all, uh, Putin super spies?
-
Hmm. Then you haven't even followed Trump's twitter account. Which makes you ... not a serious interlocutor on this point.
-
To the contrary, I have. But I am human and can forget things every now and then. Every Trump tweet that I can recall offhand alluding to "spygate" always references a very general phrase, such as "embedded informant." But I guess that makes me not a "serious interlocutor." Lol
-
So I went through all of Trump's tweets where he references a spy. There was not one single instance of him referencing a specific person's name. ...So do you know whom Marcy is talking about, Thomas? Here, see for yourself. https://mobile.twitter.com/search?q=from%3ArealDonaldTrump%20spy&src=typed_query …
-
Pretending for the moment you're operating in good faith, just for shits and giggles, where did you say "name" here?https://twitter.com/88softaIlherita/status/1008362946823516160 …
-
You asked me why Trump hasn't "wailed" against FBI's asset Felix Sater. I told you (quite correctly) that Trump hasn't "single[d] out any of the FBI's or CIA's assets that were used against his political campaign." Now we can debate the propriety of a sitting President to...
-
But then for you to use that as some sort of proof in your super Putin spies theory is, uh, intellectually questionable at best.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.