Peter Strzok's Changed Viewpoint between May and July 2017 https://www.emptywheel.net/2018/06/16/peter-strzoks-changed-viewpoint-from-may-and-july-2017/ …
-
Show this thread
-
IG Report -- & other available evidence -- actually shows the opposite of what Trump claims: Peter Strzok lost the argument to investigate suspected assets on Trump campaign aggressively. Virtually all the evidence abt whether there was "collusion" collected after he was removed.
6 replies 57 retweets 114 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @emptywheel
There r 2 prisms which 2 look at this: Prism 1 - Strzok, Paige and Agent 2 were only bad apples and were weeded out by vigilant supervisors, so move along, or, Prism 2: persons who staffed investigations picked lots of bad apples, only 3 were stupid enuf 2b discovered. Why 1 > 2?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @raitzin
Or there's the actual evidence, which I lay out and you're ignoring, which shows that FBI was unbelievably cautious in this investigation, more so than they would be investigating you or I.
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
I'm sure you believe that, but assessment of caution is a matter of judgement, which is influenced by your bias. I too am biased by my worldview (which differs from yours) and so therefore reach quite the opposite conclusion. We're all driven by our own confirmation bias :)
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
So it is your "judgment" that says FBI avoiding the most basic investigative approaches for over 6 months reflects an out of control investigation? That's not a judgment though. It's a belief, sure, but one divorced from known facts.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.