-
-
-
-
-
Am I correct that FBI still hasn't recovered the text messages for all other agents from the gap period, with whatever implications that has for criminal discovery?pic.twitter.com/wa9V419y1g
Show this thread -
Strzok's explanation for his May 18 "no big there" comment. Suggests plural Trump people approached abt emails, but was inclined to believe "opportunists seeking to advance their own or individual agendas."pic.twitter.com/7v41ZOKO3w
Show this thread -
FBI lawyer suggesting she'd need a special banner to know about Third Party doctrine.pic.twitter.com/MErDmzY4mx
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
"paid *while* working on the trump campaign" ≠ "paid *by* the trump campaign or *for* working on the trump campaign"
(it may well be a reference to manafort.) -
English language prepositions. Why must they be so difficult? Don't spoil may fantasy that someone actually got paid BY the campaign!! Tho this is also an interesting suggestion, but early to be a subject.https://twitter.com/Meridius_26/status/1007344168409198592 …
-
Actually, by same logic and timing (Nov 22), it could be discovery of Flynn's Turkish boodoggle.
-
i agree
-
Damnit. Still looking for someone Trump paid himself then.
-
Those two ladies in Moscow? (sorry, so very sorry, I'm going to let myself out quietly)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Sorry to spoil your party with more truth.https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1007368948810240000 …
-
Well, aside to Strzok suggesting multiple Trump people were offered emails. For an intel guy Jack ain't so bright. In any case, that they're talking abt these cases via SMS in any case is ridiculous. But I wouldn't expect the evidence, pro or con, to be in SMS texts.
-
Its all a distraction using lies to bury the truth while the corrupt people run free. I don't understand how no one comprehends this!
-
By corrupt you mean the guy who used his private charity to pay of his legal fines or the setting US policy towards foreign countries based off what brands they approve for his daughter?
-
NO! I mean the corrupt "people" that used their private charities and Soros donations to cheat in 2016 an still lost. No wonder Coney was fired to covering for the Clintons. The truth is right in people face but they choose to not see it.https://geopolitics.co/2017/03/21/fbi-dir-james-comey-board-member-of-hsbc-clinton-foundation-drug-cartel-launderer/ …
-
The State of NY says there is overwhelming evidence that Trump did just that: cheated. Lost the popular vote too. Mueller is still investigating whether Trump ALSO cheated w/Russia, Saudi Arabia, Israel, and UAE. But it's very clear he cheated.
-
Overwhelming sources? Come on! The only one that cheated with proof are the Clintons are parts of the FBI and CIA! These are KNOWN and PROVEN facts! Sorry to hear feelings are crushed.
-
- 9 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
