True. But if he didn't exist would that make our hypocrisy okay, or just successful?
I'd say that's a fair distinction between internal use. That is, RU can and does hack its own citizens in problematic ways (including to collect evidence to kill them). 1/2
-
-
But Jack's piece is abt international use. That's a harder distinction to make. Especially since most of our hacking/info ops v Russia is done under EO 12333, where there's only limited Congressional oversight.
-
Did anything happen at all, in regard to what the US does internationally as a result of the Snowden scandal?
-
In what context? Obama passed PPD-28, which is fairly meaningless and unenforceable. And that's about collection, not hacking. There's also the President's Review Group, which led to more formal VEP process only really formalized after Shadow Brokers.
-
WRT domestic collection (not the subject here), USAF brought a few new transparency benefits, but arguably led to more innocent people being exposed to full brunt of NSA analysis.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.