None of the lawyers in the New York matter are making public statements, though, and there's nothing on the docket. In terms of the cooperation talk, it reads to me like a lot of background message-sending is going on with these stories.
-
-
Of those, the special master found 162 are considered privileged or partially privileged. Another seven items were deemed “highly personal.”http://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/390662-review-of-cohen-documents-finds-small-number-of-privileged-items …
-
also: President Donald Trump, his longtime lawyer Michael Cohen, and the Trump Organization have so far claimed as privileged just 252 documents seized last monthhttp://www.businessinsider.com/michael-cohen-trump-claim-minuscule-amount-of-documents-privileged-2018-5 …
-
You’re missing the point: The only dispute from the Cohen end will be over which of those Jones does not agree are privileged or thinks are potentially subject to the crime-fraud exception.
-
right. my point is that Trump as intervenor can argue wrt privilege classification of his docs. Hannity has said he wont argue wrt his docs. so that leaves open the question about who would/could argue Broidy docs if not Cohen.
-
And I'm JUST SAYING that given the tiny number of documents -- 3 -- thus far identified (not to mention the Hendon letter I just linked) it's highly there's a dispute as to Broidy.
-
if you mean highly unlikely, then yes i agree with you. but perhaps Broidy docs were agreed as privileged. Cohen was there to assert privilege on those. it's just one possible explanation as to why Cohen paid such a high price to make these challenges in this manner.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.