And now for something different: an opinion that the dossier is itself Russian disinfo, which means there was no Russian collusion to install the President, because uhhh Putin was a) tracking Steele to feed him disinfo & b) Putin believed Hillary was going to win so why not?https://twitter.com/emptywheel/status/1006954017061326848 …
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @JPHX
That's your opinion or one you're ascribing to me,
@empiricalerror, and/or Dan Hoffman? Bc I'm certain none of the three of us believe there was no RU effort to install Trump.1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @empiricalerror
Oh, just me blabbing. No intended reflection on you or anyone else. I just like collecting alternative versions of reality because you never know if the reality you think you're in is the real one. (And although I find the assertion a bit tenuous, it is completely plausible.)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I would also say that WSJ subscribers and punditry will probably read this and think it proves that Hillary was in league with/played by Putin, then do the usual "witch hunt" chorale as a reprise, despite the article itself pointing out RU hacking occurred.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @emptywheel @empiricalerror
Yes, and I am sheepishly realizing the link was a reply tweet I quoted after the fact, thinking more about WSJ readership than content. As an aside, love your work, please don't banhammer ;)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.