No one has been charged w/destroying evidence or visa fraud yet. But National Security Division DAAG Adam Hickey seems to think they might get charged.
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks for this interesting chart-analysis. I focused my testimony more on Americans' liability for election interference. But I also think false statements and destruction of evidence are significant. Here are my thoughts on false statements 1/2https://www.justsecurity.org/51399/cover-lie-russia-trump-campaign-conspiracy-perjury-suborn/ …
-
Not meant as a criticism. Just a comparison of how two experts w/o Hickey's presumed direct insight view the possible charges differently. An interesting thought experience.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
What is IRA? Perhaps, a stupid question but all I can come up with is the Irish Republican Army.
-
Shorthand for the table: Internet Research Agency
-
That was too easy
I tend to miss the obvious at times! Thank you!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
When
@PeterAlexander starts sounding like@emptywheel,
shit’s gittin real
https://twitter.com/peteralexander/status/1006715554835718144 …Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Doesn't wire and bank fraud have a longer statute of limitations than the standard 5-6 years?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.