-
-
1) "Persons D1 & D2 both preserved the msgs they received from Manafort [… &] have provided them to the gov't." 2) "The gov't *confirmed* that these msgs wr sent by Manafort, upon review of Manafort’s iCloud account pursuant to a court-authorized search." 3) I await ur splainer.
-
Maybe your 2) is your Manafort-splainer? Wouldn't gov need to confirm beyond what D1 & D2 submitted that those were indeed M's comms? If so & M was dumb enoy to auto-backup his WhatsApp & Mueller had warrant to scoop his iCloud...
-
Also, if Mueller had warrant to survey Manafort for ongoing crimes, he'd be gathering anything of Manafort regardless of what other people turned in. And that might've compelled D1 & D2 to turn over comms w Manafort to begin with.
-
Warrants don't work that way.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I’m curious as to what you are accusing them of
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I’m really waiting for some explanations too. Some things you said last night were very strong statements. “Parallel construction”, “Mueller’s biggest fuck up yet”. You may owe your readers a few extra characters there, no?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.