But let's go back to the start. Cordero pretends--as surveillance boosters generally do--that civ lib defenders don't give a shit about private sector data. Ummm.
-
-
Show this thread
-
The way I think of it is, "if they collect it, the spies will come," via legal process or hacks. Also note: some tech companies appear to be adopting applications used by spies for use on their customers and vice versa.
Show this thread -
Also, reading this piece, you wouldn't know that the US, like Russia, engages in influence operations (as do private companies and other foreign govts here).
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thus leading me to wonder why is lawfare publishing this?
-
It's not offensive and for that crowd thinks new thoughts. It's just a testament, IMO, to the cognitive blinders that *many* but not all people within those circles have.
-
I wasn’t assuming offensive but rather that I would have expected more thinking/insight from them given what I’ve read in the past - I found your thread on it very interesting. I’m no expert on lawfare tho. Doing crim appeals I’m usually reading cases and not articles.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I feel creepy and dirty just reading through headlines this a.m. Yes, some pieces make my head hurt, but so many are about evil corporate greed and subornation and no ethics. Must be what it was like before Rome burned.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Cordero makes my head hurt too. Perhaps we could discuss unalienable rights within declaration of independence impinged upon through gov. metadata like collection vs corporate metadata like collection impacting franchise.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Baby steps
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.