If, per Byron contrary to the evidence included in his piece, Halper "insinuated himself into the Trump campaign," then so did Joseph Mifsud, Ivan Timofeev, and Ike Kaveladze.https://twitter.com/ByronYork/status/1001440920062038017 …
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Happy to answer after you answer the Q I've asked 4 times now: would you refer FBI map out all Pap's contacts, which they could do at same investigative level?
I think it was a totally legit counterintelligence investigation. Ok you can answer my question now.
I think we don't know with whom--Pap and Page--Halper was formally used. Both were legit CI subjects, however.
So in order to know whether he was a spy you would have to know who in the campaign he talked to??
I think you mean CHS.
That's the noun. My original question asked for a verb. But anyway I'll take a stab at it: "The FBI confidentially human sourced on the Trump campaign." There, is that better?
Nope. Bc given known circumstances Halper only CHSed with 2 members of campaign and did so well outside scope of campaign, per Clovis, who'd be the guy who'd know.
Ok, so we can say "the FBI confidentially sourced on certain members of the Trump campaign." Better?
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.