In which I raise concerns abt the specific language targeting Wikileaks in the DNC suit.https://twitter.com/pressfreedom/status/1001493006120378373 …
I think the case supporting both those claims is not airtight at all. And I think Russia built in far more plausible deniability than is yet public.
-
-
It's a complaint; the evidence wouldn't be expected to be airtight at this stage. But enough is alleged that it's not fair to draw a conclusion that DNC's allegations could set a bad precedent for journalism.
-
Again, in the areas specifically talking about WL conduct, they describe activities that are solidly journalistic activities. They lose that I have less of a problem. It's a complaint. I imagine a placeholder. Hopefully they'll fix these problems going forward.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.