In which I raise concerns abt the specific language targeting Wikileaks in the DNC suit.https://twitter.com/pressfreedom/status/1001493006120378373 …
-
-
Agree, I think. But not sure which you're classifying as which?
-
Tweet unavailable
-
DOJ tried hard to substantiate an Assange recruit of Manning, but did not. WL's role may well have changed since. We shall see.
-
But I agree that there should be real clarity on difference between recruited leak--especially third party--and a person choosing on their own to leak.
-
One concern I specifically raised in the interview is how DOJ is using Reality Winner's access to secure drop--of the Intercept but not WaPo--as a means to incriminate her.
-
Yes, and I allude to the SecureDrop issue in the opening of the piece—it's important. I think you raise important questions
@jeffhauser about the distinction between leakers/hackers. Those are questions I would have liked to pose to DNC lawyers, if they had agreed to an interview -
But, I think it's also important to acknowledge the role state-backed hackers are playing in the media these days. look at the Broidy stories. We want to be careful about exposing publishers to liability in those cases as well.
- 7 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.