Not to mention most of these bozos enthusiastically supported reauthorization of FISA 702 without fixing any of the known problems with it.
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I have a new policy of specifically ignoring any criticism, no matter how valid, as soon as I see race included for no reason whatsoever. Be better.
-
How should I restate that such that it would be of interest to you--genuine question? If I said "they care only about 2 GOPers"? Is raising party okay? Or just tribe?
-
I just spelled it out for you. Don’t include race for no reason whatsoever. This is not a difficult concept.
-
It's a measure of the bad faith among the Republicans squealing about "spies" in Trump campaign that they've neither asked for more scrutiny on intel contractors in FISA apps generally nor asked to bump up standards for use of CHS. That is, they only care abt 2 Republicans.
-
That’s valid. See?
-
OK. Thanks.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Talking about spies, lets be clear who the real spies are among us, all in an effort to
#OBSTRUCT which is damn obvious to everyone if they're truthful.pic.twitter.com/3dizWoxFZG
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
really only 1 white man that they care about, tbh
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.