Oh. 1) SOL even on some of Trump's known actions (say, 12/29/16 deferral of sanctions) runs out 5 years later, so in that case 12/29/21. 2) Trump's testimony will affect aides (POTUS and VPOTUS was crucial, eg, in Libby case), who will end up in court.
-
-
That's separate from my theory of the case, which, admittedly, I have no evidence that Mueller agrees with, but do believe evidence exists to support.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
the crimes alleged and the activities one believes to constitute said crimes are of course part of the theory of a case.
-
Oh. Except ConFraudUs has already been charged in 2 totally different contexts, and speak more to a structure and an associative legal liability.
-
but see, "speak more to a structure" is *your* theory. despite these having occurred in "2 totally different contexts" - as you admit - , you divine an overall structure, aka theory of the case, purposely designed to ultimately go after trump. i'm saying that's a logical leap.
-
Is it true that ConFraudUs got charged (and pled) in Gates/Manafort? Is it true that ConFraudUs got charged in IRA? Is it true it has been used in past POTUS cases?
-
so you admit that it's just your theory. okay, thanks for clearing that up.
-
It's my theory that ConFraudUs has already been charged twice here?
-
How about this. Is it true someone who DOES know Mueller's theory of the case has said "Many aspects of investigation are factually & legally interconnected: they involve overlapping courses of conduct, relationships, & events, & rely on similar sources, methods, & techniques."?
-
How about this: if someone made an agreement to participate in a conspiracy in June and again later in the summer, that person can be charged in the conspiracy?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.