for trump, his republican allies and his base, this isn't about facts, it's all about feels. and that's what the messaging targets.
I've written a shit-ton about this. Refer to my posts, which numerous American lawyers have not only agreed with in principle but borrowed from.
-
-
okay, marcy. thanks.
-
Do you need links to the numerous posts I've written about ConFraudUs? Hell, given that Trump gave more than bribery, he'd even reverse the trend there.
-
did i ask for any links?
-
No. I was just surprised that you think there aren't abundant crimes available. As I and other people with actual JDs have pointed out, Mueller has already laid out a structure under which he can go after Trump & the larger conspiracy.
-
i am familiar with your theory of the case, or what you think mueller's theory of the case is. it's one possible theory of the case. it's not the only one, nor is it necessarily the "right" one, as in: the one mueller's pursuing.
-
ConFraudUs is a crime, not a theory of the case. It is a crime that, bc it involves conspiracy, is tremendously useful in charging activities like the one before us (and has been used repeatedly as such).
-
That's separate from my theory of the case, which, admittedly, I have no evidence that Mueller agrees with, but do believe evidence exists to support.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.