Now you're making a different argument, one I agree with: that he's campaigning as a victim, bc that's what he does. But that's unrelated to the legal case.
-
-
no, that's exactly what i've been saying the entire time. you cannot draw any *legal* inferences from giuliani's bs because it's not about the legal case, it's just campaigning.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
And I keep going back to Flood, from whom you most certainly can, bc unlike Rudy he's not a buffoon. The two actions are linked.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
1) your initial statement, which this thread is about, was on giuliani. who's changing argument's now? 2) flood would be an idiot if didn't use the dust thrown up by trump and giuliani to learn as much about the underlying legal case as he can.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
emptywheel Retweeted emptywheel
yup. A statement made with an eye towards "entire strategy," which includes Flood.https://twitter.com/emptywheel/status/1000809404231544832 …
emptywheel added,
emptywheel @emptywheelReplying to @empiricalerrorWe agree that far. And I'm saying, once you build "this will go to impeachment" into your narrative, than you've laid out that that's your ultimate greatest fear. Not to mention that the entire strategy is an admission they have no facts or law left to argue.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @empiricalerror and
And Flood isn't getting evidence on the underlying legal case. He's not getting GJ materials. He's not getting ANY idea of full scope of investigation. He's getting evidence to impeach Halper that he knows will be used outside of legal venue.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
you're saying the halper information is not pertinent to the underlying legal case? that's absurd.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
THAT FBI chose to use an informant? Or are you suggesting that Halper found really damning info on either Page or Pap?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
i'm not suggesting anything either way. i do not know and neither do you.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I'm just trying to understand your question. Are you asking, do I think the material that Ross has reported is "pertinent to the underlying legal case"? If Ross and his sources have reported it accurately, no.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Are you asking, is it possible Halper played a key role in revealing the most damning details against Trump or Russia? Absolutely, I even have one or two in mind.
-
-
i've already answered that. i do not know and neither do you.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.