no, that's not what he's saying, i don't think.
-
-
yeah, and? the competent lawyer might just be competent enough to realize that trump's gonna trump and it's best to go along with it.
-
y'all think that you can draw some inference about trump's guilt or the degree of his legal predicament from those public utterances and actions by giuliani et al. and i say that's not the case, i.e. there is no relationship between those two things.
-
thought experiment: assume trump is 100% innocent and he knows it. would he be acting any differently?
-
Has John Dowd lied to him abt when this would end, y/n? Has Michael Cohen been raided, y/n? Why is he employing this far more, with one exception, than the Stormy challenge?
-
you haven't answered my question.
-
He would be acting differently bc in other legal cases he has acted differently. But you can't separate those other cases from being president, which is why I raise Stormy where ... he's acting somewhat differently.
-
That said, it's hard to imagine what Trump would do if he were innocent bc I'm not aware of any legal challenges of him where he was innocent.
-
i'll take that as a no.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.