So Rudy's admitting that Mueller has enough to name Trump as unindicted co-conspirator? Glad he has cleared that up.https://twitter.com/ryanstruyk/status/1000741954337083393 …
-
-
no. it's not.
-
If trump & giuliani were confident the facts and law were on their side, they wouldnt be talking about public opinion and impeachment.
-
If Flood thought Trump could win by winning in court or w/Exec tactics, he wouldn't have come on with this strategy already in motion.
-
this whole argument about "winning in court" is absurd because trump will not end up in court. doj's position is that sitting president cannot be indicted and mueller is bound by that policy.
-
Oh. 1) SOL even on some of Trump's known actions (say, 12/29/16 deferral of sanctions) runs out 5 years later, so in that case 12/29/21. 2) Trump's testimony will affect aides (POTUS and VPOTUS was crucial, eg, in Libby case), who will end up in court.
-
3) Naming Trump a co-conspirator may lead him to end up in court, via any of several means.
-
okay, lol
-
> 1) SOL even on some of Trump's known actions (say, 12/29/16 deferral of sanctions) runs out 5 years later, so in that case 12/29/21. what's the crime? under which law? flood, whom you base your arguments on, works for the white house, so anything after trump's...
- 8 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.