Show me your evidence to back your claims. That's all I'm asking.
-
-
Mifsud had an opportunity to relay information that only the real hackers would know "DNC", "Podesta" "WikiLeaks". He never mentioned them. Instead he talked about "emails of Hillary", a subject that was widely speculated on at the time. Not enough to start an investigation
-
You're 1) changing the subject 2) talking about details you don't know 3) ignoring some details about how emails were released--the week after the June 9 meeting. We were talking abt Pap telling Downer the RUs were going to release TO HELP TRUMP.
-
Right, and I'm still waiting for you to provide evidence of that very specific claim. You have not.
-
Right. I asked for two admissions for you first.
-
Those being?
-
I guess you've already conceded 1, given that you have found new details (neither of which is an official record).https://twitter.com/emptywheel/status/1000768680546983937 …
-
I'll admit I'm missing some part of the public record that proves your claim as soon as you furnish it. And I'll admit that Chuck has ignored it too. Now, what you got?
-
Actually, I will say this, in conjunction w/Chuck's latest, pretty much seals it. https://www.emptywheel.net/2018/02/24/schiff-memo-reveals-that-mifsud-specifically-told-papadopoulos-russia-would-release-hillary-emails-to-help-trump-campaign/ … Tho Chuck STILL gets a key detail on Pap's plea wrong, the poor boy, in his effort to make Pap's lies look less incriminating than they were.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
