Where are you getting that? There's nothing in the indictment about Mifsud saying that. And the HILLARY EMAILS WERE NEVER RELEASED!
-
-
The bottom line is : no evidence "Russia" hacked the DNC or Podesta. Refused the let FBI have server. Crowdstrike work has been debunked. No evidence Mifsud knew anything. No evidence Papadopoulos told Campaign what Mifsud said. WikiLeaks says Russia wasn't it's source.
-
I see you're dodging on the evidence that Papa told Downer Mifsud had told him Russia was going to release emails to help Trump. Why won't Chuck tell you that detail?
-
Most of what we know about what Downer (who steered $25M of Australian tax payer money to the Clinton Foundation) was told we know from this article. https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/12/30/us/politics/how-fbi-russia-investigation-began-george-papadopoulos.html … Again, nowhere does it mention the claim that you made above.
-
Sigh. You were so close. And now you're wandering again.
-
Mifsud had an opportunity to relay information that only the real hackers would know "DNC", "Podesta" "WikiLeaks". He never mentioned them. Instead he talked about "emails of Hillary", a subject that was widely speculated on at the time. Not enough to start an investigation
-
You're 1) changing the subject 2) talking about details you don't know 3) ignoring some details about how emails were released--the week after the June 9 meeting. We were talking abt Pap telling Downer the RUs were going to release TO HELP TRUMP.
-
Right, and I'm still waiting for you to provide evidence of that very specific claim. You have not.
-
Right. I asked for two admissions for you first.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Ok, whut? GTFO
@ChuckRossDC BLOCKED you? Jeebus H Christo It’s@Twitter Chuck!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
