A deeply unsettling contrast: Congress’s obsession over the FBI’s (likely lawful) use of a foreign counterintelligence informant vs. its deafening silence with respect to claims that US government officials may have hired a foreign intelligence firm to spy on American citizens.https://twitter.com/colinkahl/status/1000074408700985344 …
-
-
Replying to @steve_vladeck
I’m curious about the “likely”; is there any statute (as opposed to, say, DIOG rule) that it COULD have violated, at least from the account now public?
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @normative
Just hedging because of the still classified facts. I could probably construct a hypothetical in which it would violate _something_...
4 replies 1 retweet 7 likes
Replying to @steve_vladeck @normative
DIOG is not a law, right? I mean if it is I’ve got a slew of “least intrusive” violations to talk about.
5:12 PM - 25 May 2018
0 replies
0 retweets
2 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.