The Guardian's chief executive on why fossil fuel ads must go: "It's not about consumer choice, it's about consumers believing these companies are investing in a greener future, which is just not a fair reflection of the realities of their business."https://heated.world/p/everything-you-wanted-to-know-about …
-
-
The Guardian will not, however, advocate for other news outlets to ban fossil fuel ads. "I think we're trying to be quite humble about this. We've made a choice. It's very much about our values. I think it's not really for us to dictate to others."https://heated.world/p/everything-you-wanted-to-know-about …
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
I'm not sure I understand the difference between "promoting a product" and "change perceptions about what a company's doing" in this era of Corporate Social Responsibility on steroids. Both are on the same agenda. Product protection is the basis of lobbying, no?
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Here's an example:Why Nigerian activist Ken Saro-Wiwa was executed: https://p.dw.com/p/1H2Ti?maca=en-Twitter-sharing … After which Shell spends millions promoting their "great" relationship with Nigeria -- instead of cleaning up the environmental damage.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.