What should we do about the notoriously problematic cost/benefit models for acting on climate change?
-
Human beings talking to each other as equals, in a deliberative setting, can produce the most powerful change. There are lots of reasons to be cautious about stories alone, when people don't invent the story being told. A set of notes from a while back: http://www.one-country.com/081Polletta.html …
I think we are in (non)violent agreement :) https://twitter.com/emahlee/status/1231004824214224897?s=21 …https://twitter.com/emahlee/status/1231004824214224897 …
agree: people absolutely need to talk and *listen* to each other. But those conversations will go much better if we are inspired with vision and perspective through art and storytelling. https://twitter.com/cityatlas/status/1231003653298950147 …
-
-
I (still) haven’t seen Parasite - but really really want to! From what I’ve read, it’s a climate change story about class and capitalism. Think about all the thinking and conversations it started...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It may be a quirk on my part, but I find it reassuring to see the UK House of Lords discussing the Absolute Zero report from
@ukfires. It's a more forthright discussion than I expected. https://hansard.parliament.uk/lords/2020-02-06/debates/22BE288A-6BCF-4D5A-BE0E-F3EFAB702D4A/ClimateChange …pic.twitter.com/gVROX1IhWP
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.