You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Or, if the Times was afraid of angering big advertisers how about this one, which talks directly about Exxon funding climate denial? https://www.nytimes.com/1998/04/26/us/industrial-group-plans-to-battle-climate-treaty.html …pic.twitter.com/ihuzySuaa2
The point I was trying to make is not that the Times was/is afraid of angering big advertisers. It is much more insidious than that. Much more about framing. See this thread by @AlexSteffen 
https://twitter.com/alexsteffen/status/1018861315237076992?s=21 …
I think it is unlikely conversations like this happened, “We’re killing the piece. Exxon just dropped $1M in advertising.” Instead, the very framing by journalists of how we understand climate change and solutions is a product of the Carbon Lobby. See:https://twitter.com/alexsteffen/status/1018861616362917888?s=21 …
John, do you think the dominant framing in the press (that Alex lays out) of climate from the 1990s until even now (tho that’s changing) has been appropriate? If not, why? My answer: No, it hasn’t. Why? Massive amounts of money spent on disinformation including advertorials.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
