Oh, I didn't take away from Kingsmill that BRI is green. Not at all. Only that China would be able to leverage BRI for energy dominance when renewables take over more of the market share from fossil fuels. I understood BRI to be "strategic" not intrinsically "green."
-
-
Well, renewables don't harm our atmosphere and warm the planet like fossil fuels do. Or maybe I'm misunderstanding you? From what I'm reading, the mobility of solar/wind is much more efficient too.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Oh, so you're saying renewables could be used for war and other terrible purposes? Yes, I agree. Still, renewables are are intrinsically better in that they don't warm the planet, yes?
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
I see your point. But decarbonization seems to be a convergence of a number of factors: * pressure from the public / activists * legal challenges to fossil fuel * cheaper, better tech that the market will want to exploit * shaken investor confidence from all of the above
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
I don't know that we can take China in isolation though. Putting China in a global context, those first two are relevant because China is reacting to other *global markets.* For instance, the rise of EVs in California.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.