"For example, the Belt and Road is a way of expanding Chinese path through land-based system." 23/
-
Show this thread
-
"The Belt and Road is a series of infrastructure, transport, and energy initiatives whereby Chinese capital and Chinese expertise is going to a series of countries in order to expand their infrastructure links." 24/
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
More context on the Belt and Road Initiative from wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belt_and_Road_Initiative … 25/
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
"Sea power has been intrinsic to the dominance of the US in order to protect fossil fuel transport. Now, if it's electricity which will be the dominant source of links and transmission of energy between countries, it will be land power." 26/
1 reply 0 retweets 1 likeShow this thread -
"It's been quite impressive how China is using the Belt and Road to increase its land power to its neighbors." 27/
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
"One error that's very, very often made is people will say, 'Well, we're a very long way from renewables being 100% of all energy, therefore when it's 100%, wake me up.' Well, of course, that's not how the world works. The world works on marginal change, basically." 28/
1 reply 1 retweet 1 likeShow this thread -
"It's very notable that when we switched from wood to coal after 1800, coal doesn't become largest global energy source until 1905. But the whole of the 19th C was the working out of the consequences of the rise of those countries which exploited this new energy technology." 29/
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @emahlee
Since we need to dramatically change our reliance on fossil fuels over a much shorter period of time (since we didn't act earlier), how can we possibly shift in time to avoid the high carbon emissions scenario?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @carichardsrn
I'm still learning how this could happen, but I think it's not "one thing" but a multipronged attack. What also gives me hope: s-curves and the non-linear nature of large-scale, rapid change (the conditions for which are emerging now). https://www.google.com/search?q=s+curves&oq=s+curves&aqs=chrome..69i57j0l5.2494j0j4&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emahlee @carichardsrn
Emily Cunningham Retweeted Gregor Macdonald
Also:
@GregorMacdonald may know how we can speed up the energy transition. (This is outside my knowledge domain and expertise but something I also very much want to learn!) See #2 in his tweet:https://twitter.com/GregorMacdonald/status/1153436984167153664 …Emily Cunningham added,
Gregor Macdonald @GregorMacdonaldOccasional reminder that: 1. Energy transition is not going fast enough to counter 200 years of FF combustion. 2. We can go much faster, based on current prices, using wind+solar in the lead w/ some nuclear, too. 3. The progress you see below was neither painful, nor radical. pic.twitter.com/tj8XZq8DsQShow this thread1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Emily Cunningham Retweeted Emily Cunningham
Also check out @drvox's piece on climate and hope – he gets into S-curves!https://twitter.com/emahlee/status/1079865403038298112 …
Emily Cunningham added,
-
-
Replying to @emahlee @carichardsrn and
Emily Cunningham Retweeted Emily Cunningham
This other piece by
@drvox on climate hope is very, very good. Screenshots of some of the juicier bits in this tweethttps://twitter.com/emahlee/status/1146296747167277056 …Emily Cunningham added,
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.