You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
My main point is that we have "scientists" willing to put economic cost projection figures on devastating climate change: that it will "cost" x% of GDP growth going forward. These are complete and utter bollocks - no one can predict all the costs of climate disasters. 2/
It sounds like we can't predict either the economic cost OR number of human deaths from climate change (not just specific climate events). At least not yet. Is that right? If that's so, why do these numbers get repeated so often?
If economic numbers are bollocks, but treated as truth, seems odd that there's so much criticism of people who quote the number of deaths. Sounds like *no one knows* - there hasn't been enough study? Is that correct?
Would it be more accurate to say, scientists' "educated estimates" or "projections" say X number of deaths? Does such estimates even exist?
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
